Sunday, March 30, 2014

Week 9

Assignment #3:

Summarize:
QRI-5 is an assessment that focuses on students’ word identification and reading comprehension abilities. Students are provided with a passage to read and required to answer some questions related to the content of the passage after reading.
DIBELS is made up of a serious of procedures and tests focusing on five main parts: Phonemic Awareness, Alphabetic Principle, Accuracy and Fluency with text, Vocabulary and Comprehension.

Similarities and Differences:
QRI-5 and DIBELS are measurements and assessments for identifying students’ reading abilities and monitoring teachers’ intervention strategies. Both assessments require students read and retell. Both assessments are intended in helping students become better readers.
However, QRI-5 is a comprehensive tool while DIBELS is a detailed one. QRI-5 focuses more on students’ word identification and reading comprehension, and DIBELS takes more detailed elements into consideration including phonemic and alphabet.

Instructional planning and decisions

    In any classrooms, students’ reading abilities will be at different reading levels. Teachers can use these assessments to determine each student’s reading levels and make corresponding solutions. It is an important tool for differentiation instructions. Teachers can make adjustments to different students to help them achieve better performance on their levels.

Friday, March 14, 2014

Week 8

Assignment #3:
Candidate’s Name: Jingyi Yuan
Grade Level: Grade 2
Title of the Lesson: Reading Fluency
Length of the lesson: 45 minutes

Key Points:
1.      Phonemics
2.      Letters and alphabets
3.      Letter-sound correspondence

Learning Objectives:
1.      Students will learn to make prediction of the reading material through topic.
2.      Students will learn to read independently and increase self-correction rate.
3.      Students will learn to pronounce words contain the same diphthong.
4.      Students will learn to assess themselves.

Sequences of Activities:
5 mins: Before reading, students will have a brainstorming of what the article is going to talk about according to the topic.
5 mins: Students will go over the article for the first time by themselves. Sheet 2-5
10 mins: Introduce high-frequency words and words contain diphthongs “ou, ow, oi, oy” Sheet 1
5 mins: Teacher will read aloud to the whole class.
10 mins: Students will work in pairs and read the article again.
5 mins: Go over the words on sheet 1 again.
5 mins: Read a similar article for assessment. Sheet 6-7

Standards:
Phonics and Word Recognition:
CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RF.2.3 Know and apply grade-level phonics and word analysis skills in decoding words.
Fluency:
CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RF.2.4  Read with sufficient accuracy and fluency to support comprehension.
CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RF.2.4.A  Read grade-level text with purpose and understanding.
CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RF.2.4.B  Read grade-level text orally with accuracy, appropriate rate, and expression on successive readings.
CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RF.2.4.C  Use context to confirm or self-correct word recognition and understanding, rereading as necessary.

Resources and Materials:
Reading material sheet 1-7

Assessment:

Students will assess themselves on the rubric and teacher will meet with the students to go over the reading and their rubric. Teacher will offer feed-back and grade them with running record.






 



Assignment #1:
• How did the kindergarten teachers, Sheila Owens and John Sinnett, incorporate elements of emergent literacy in their lessons? Which elements were the primary focus of the lessons? 
  Sheila used the word wall to help students practice high frequency words. Students are able to refer it back as a resource, and they use the resource to create new sentences. John Sinnett also used word wall for students to complete the words in a paragraph. Both of the teachers focus on the word in their lessons.

• What part did oral language play in both classrooms? 
In Sheila Owen’s classroom, she had students pointing at what they were reading. In John Sinnett’s classroom, he had students filling out the blanks with reading it aloud. Oral language plays an important role in both classrooms. They practice spelling and oral language at the same time.

• How did each teacher use the Word Wall to support word study? 
    Sheila Owen used the word wall as a resource for students to refer when making a new sentence. John Sinett used the word wall to help students fill out the complete message.

• What were examples of planned, explicit instruction in these excerpts? What were examples of opportunistic instruction? 
    Both teachers planned their instruction that students can build up their own sentence by referring the word wall. Students have opportunities to complete the tasks.

• Both kindergarten teachers used whole-class instruction for their word study lessons. How did it meet the needs of all students? 
In Sheila Owen’s classroom, she called on a student to lead the  
In John Sinett’s classroom, students are given time to think about the answers. Students have opportunities to think by themselves. He called on students and encouraged the rest to check.


Assignment #2
• How did Charmon Evans and Shari Frost differ in their phonics instruction? Why do you think they used different approaches? 
Chamon Evans showed the students a certain part of a word first and encouraged students to share the words they could come up with. Shari Frost presented the word first and ask students to think about the pronunciation of the part, then she encourages students to think of some other new words related to the part.

• Which principles of phonics instruction were illustrated in these classroom lessons? 
Both of teachers used vowel combination and words that have the same ending for the lessons. Students were encouraged to discover the regular pattern.

• Which lessons seemed to promote more student engagement and motivation? 
Shari Frost’s class seemed to promote more student engagement and motivation because it is an open discussion which everyone could take part in. One thing I like about her class is that she used visual clues to deepen students’ impression and she always gave examples that interested students such as “muggle”.

• Shari Frost used her "Poem of the Week" and Becky Pursley used her "Readers Theater activities" to practice reading accuracy and fluency. How did student performance in the two activities differ? How would you assess the reading fluency of students performing Readers Theater based on the three stages of fluency? 
    In Readers Theater activities, students of different reading levels can work together. Students of the higher level will motivate the students of lower level. Students will build up confidence in the activity. In the poem of the Week, one student pointed out the word and everybody else said it out loud together. In this activity, students cannot be assessed accurately.

• What other activities would you planned to promote reading fluency?

    I will create a classroom library and let my students have their opportunities to choose their favorite books to read. Also I will do share reading with them and raise up some questions about the reading content. 

Tuesday, March 11, 2014

Week 7

Assignment #5:

Websites:
Children all like cartoon characters. The website has interactive games and activities based on Dr. Suess’ stories.
This website has abundant resources of elementary phonics worksheets which are customizable and online phonics games.

This website has hundreds of free online coloring pages. Everything is interactive and children can save their own gallery and share with friends.

Monday, March 3, 2014

Week 6


Mary needs an intervention to enhance her reading ability. From the results of her reading assessment, I decided to give her extra lessons 30 minutes per day for the following weeks (Three weeks would be enough for the instruction).
For the first week, I will work together with her doing some share reading, and generate some questions related to main ideas and details to assess her understanding after reading. For the second week, I will teach her some methods for better generalization and summarization of the article (both main idea and details). For the last week, I will let her read independently and give out some assessment at the end of the intervention.

Mini Lesson Plan
Topic: Reading with Tools
Level: Grade 3
Objective:
1. Students will learn to obtain both main idea and details from an article.
2. Enhance students' ability of reading comprehension. 
3. Students will learn to use tools for better comprehension and memorizing.
Procedure:
1.      Present Mary with the topic. Ask some questions before reading to assess Mary’s precious knowledge about the article.
2.      Let Mary read the whole article and record her reading process.
3.      Provide a table of the main content for Mary to fill in the details.
4.      Go back to the article and implement the details in the table.
5.      Have Mary retell the story and ask questions from the sheet.
Standards:
NY- New York State Core Curriculum
Subject: English Language Arts
Grade Range: Grades 2–4
Strand: Reading
Core Performance Indicator: Identify purpose for reading
Core Performance Indicator: Use decoding strategies, such as sounding out words, comparing similar words, breaking words into smaller words, and looking for word parts, such as root words, prefixes, and suffixes
Core Performance Indicator: Use self-monitoring strategies, such as rereading and cross-checking
Core Performance Indicator: Apply corrective strategies, using classroom resources, such as teachers, peers, and reference tools
Core Performance Indicator: Recognize the difference between phrases and sentences
Core Performance Indicator: Recognize and discriminate among a variety of informational texts
Core Performance Indicator: Read aloud at appropriate rate
Core Performance Indicator: Maintain a personal reading list to reflect reading goals and accomplishments
Assessment:

A small question form will be given to assess Mary’s understanding.

Reading Material:

Assessment:




Sunday, March 2, 2014

Week 5 Assignments

Word List Level #1:
From the video, Mary got 18 words correct. 16 of the words were automatically identified and 2 were identified. Wrong words are: brain, afraid
Total Correct Automatic = 16/20 = 80%
Total Correct Identified = 2/20 = 10%
Total Number Correct = 15/20 = 90%
The score 90% is at the Independent Level.

Word List Level #2:
From the video, Mary got 15 words correct. 14 of the words were automatically identified and 1 was identified. Wrong words are: though, begins, breathe, insects, noticed.
Total Correct Automatic = 14/20 = 70%
Total Correct Identified = 1/20 = 5%
Total Number Correct = 15/20 = 75%
The score 75% is at the Instructional Level.

Word List Level #3:
From the video, Mary got 5 words correct. 3 of the words were automatically identified and 2 were identified.
Total Correct Automatic = 3/20 = 15%
Total Correct Identified = 2/20 = 10%
Total Number Correct = 15/20 = 25%
The score 25% is at the Frustration Level.

The previous results indicate the level of passage should be given to Mary.
Passage Level #2:
Before reading the passage, according to the three concept questions we can see that her understanding of the article was 3/9= 33%.
From the second video, Mary read a passage of 197 words in total. There were 12 errors and 3 self-correction words.
Accuracy rate = (197-12)/197 = 94%
Error rate 12/197 = 1:16
Self-correction rate = (12+3)/3 = 1:5
It indicates that Mary was independent in reading the passage. Her accuracy rate is high and her retelling is almost correct.
Rate = 11820/258 = 46WPM
Correct WPM = (197-12)*60/258 = 43CWPM

In the part of retelling the story, Mary thought of 23 points from the total 49. And from the final 8 questions, Mary retold most of the answers. The little girl had a very good beginning. She had a very fluency reading skill with words that she has already known well. She has a good comprehension ability of understanding the main idea of an article. And she was also able to go into most of the details. Last but not least, she has equipped with the basic logical thinking ability due to her retelling order. However, her confidence of reading weakened after meeting unfamiliar words. She relied on her teacher too much and her self-correction rate is low. So she probably needs more training on independent reading.